Thursday, November 28, 2019
What is happiness? Theres no general definition of happiness. Happiness varies from person to person because everyone has a different perception of what happiness actually is. Some get happiness from success, some from wealth, some from social status while some from love. Happiness indeed is a choice. For me; happiness is family and friends. Also in my diary, all the happy moments I ever had in my life are spent with them. My parents and my siblings play a major role in my happiness and satisfaction. The Almighty have blessed me with a big and supporting family. They made me a grateful person. I believe ungrateful people can never be happy in their life because happiness comes with appreciating little things and spreading love. Happiness is a must in life. In my opinion, happiness completely depends on ones own attitude. Its inevitable that human nature will see the negative energy but preferring the brighter side of the picture will make him positive and happy. We will write a custom essay sample on Happiness Is a Choice or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page After all its the attitude and outlook towards life that matters because weve seen many who have almost everything in their lives, and yet are unhappy. On the other hand , they are people who have suffered a lot but still happy with their lives. My belief is if one has a positive outlook towards life and is determined to see the positivity then certainly hell be happy throughout. Id like to sum up with this quote: Happiness is an inside job -William Arthur
Sunday, November 24, 2019
Capital Crimes and Executives Free Online Research Papers Capital Punishment Many distinctive doctrines in criminal law originated in efforts to restrict the number of capital crimes and executions. For instance, in the late 18th century, when all murder in the United States was punishable by death, Pennsylvania pioneered in dividing murder into two categories. The state enacted laws that authorized punishment of first-degree murder by death, while second-degree murder was punishable by imprisonment only. Elsewhere, penal codes uniformly required death for certain serious crimes. In these jurisdictions, discretionary powers to commute death sentences gradually expanded. (A commutation substitutes a lesser penalty for a more severe one- for example, replacing execution with a life sentence.) Today in many nations, including Turkey and Japan, the death penalty remains legal but the number of executions has declined over time. Although many jurisdictions limited imposition of the death penalty, no government had formally abolished capital punishment until Michigan did so in 1846. Within 20 years Venezuela (1863) and Portugal (1867) had formally eliminated the practice as well. By the beginning of the 20th century the death sentence had been abolished in a handful of nations, such as Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Norway, and The Netherlands. Although not formally eliminated, it had fallen into disuse in many others, including Brazil, Cape Verde, Iceland, Monaco, and Panama. The defeat of the Axis powers provided a foundation for the elimination of the death penalty in Western Europe. Some of the nations involved in the war saw abolition of capital punishment as a way to disassociate themselves from the atrocities that had taken place. Italy formally abolished the death penalty in 1947 and the Federal Republic of Germany did so in 1949. The British government instituted a Royal Commission to study capital punishment in 1950 and abolished the death penalty in 1965. (Northern Ireland did not abolish capital punishment until 1973.) By the early 1980s every major country in Europe had stopped executing criminals. Coincident with this trend in Western Europe, many countries belonging to the Commonwealth of Nations, an association of countries formerly affiliated with the British Empire, eliminated capital punishment. For instance, Canada conducted its last execution in 1962 and abolished the death penalty in 1976. New Zealand held its last execution in 1957 and Australia stopped executing criminals ten years later. A similar burst of abolitionist activity coincided with the breakup of the Soviet Union. East Germany, the Czech Republic, and Romania all outlawed capital punishment between 1987 and 1990. Throughout the former Communist countries, abolition of the death penalty was a political act far removed from the usual domain of criminal justice policy-making. Eliminating the death penalty was one of many ways the citizens of these countries rejected unlimited state power over individual life. For example, in Romania the overthrow of dictator Nicolae Ceausescu was followed by his execution an d that of members of his family. Shortly thereafter, the new government abolished capital punishment, which was associated with CeausescuÃ¢â¬â¢s brutal, tyrannical rule. Critics of capital punishment contend that it is brutal and degrading, while supporters consider it a necessary form of retribution (revenge) for terrible crimes. Those who advocate the death penalty assert that it is a uniquely effective punishment that deters crime. However, advocates and opponents of the death penalty dispute the proper interpretation of statistical analyses of its deterrent effect. Opponents of capital punishment see the death penalty as a human rights issue involving the proper limits of governmental power. In contrast, those who want governments to continue to execute tend to regard capital punishment as an issue of criminal justice policy. Because of these alternative viewpoints, there is a profound difference of opinion not only about what is the right answer on capital punishment, but about what type of question is being asked when the death penalty becomes a public issue. Execution by Guillotine During the French Revolution (1789-1799), King Louis XVI of France was tried as a traitor and condemned to death. His execution by guillotine, which took place in a crowded plaza in Paris, was a public spectacle. Early opponents of the death penalty opposed such brutal methods of criminal punishment.Corbis Early opponents of capital punishment objected to its brutality. Executions were public spectacles involving cruel methods. In addition, capital punishment was not reserved solely for the most serious crimes. Death was the penalty for a variety of minor offenses. The allegations of brutality inspired two different responses by those who supported executions. First, advocates contended that capital punishment was necessary for the safety of other citizens and therefore not gratuitous. Second, death penalty supporters sought to remove some of the most visibly gruesome aspects of execution. Executions that had been open to the public were relocated behind closed doors. Later, governments replaced traditional methods of causing death- such as hanging- with what were regarded as more modern methods, such as electrocution and poison gas. Lethal injection is now the preferred method of execution in the majority of U.S. states. The search for less brutal means of inflicting death continues to recent times. In 1977 Oklahoma became the first U.S. state to authorize execution by lethal injection- the administration of fatal amounts of fast-acting drugs and chemicals. Lethal injection is now the preferred method of execution in the majority of U.S. states. However, modern opponents of capital punishment contend that sterilized and depersonalized methods of execution do not eliminate the brutality of the penalty. In the debate about execution and human dignity, supporters and opponents of the death penalty have found very little common ground. Opponents of capital punishment assert that it is degrading to the humanity of the person punished. Since the 18th century, those who wish to abolish the death penalty have stressed the significance of requiring governments to recognize the importance of each individual. However, supporters of capital punishment see nothing wrong with governments deliberately killing terrible people who commit terrible crimes. Therefore, they see no need to limit governmental power in this area. Early opponents of capital punishment also argued that inflicting death was not necessary to control crime and properly punish wrongdoers. Instead, alternative punishment- such as imprisonment- could effectively isolate criminals from the community, deter other potential offenders from committing offenses, and express the communitys condemnation of those who break its laws. In his Essay on Crimes and Punishments, Beccaria asserted that the certainty of punishment, rather than its severity, was a more effective deterrent. Supporters of capital punishment countered that the ultimate penalty of death was necessary for the punishment of terrible crimes because it provided the most complete retribution and condemnation. Furthermore, they argued that the threat of execution was a unique deterrent. Death penalty supporters contended that capital punishment self-evidently prevents more crime because death is so much more feared than mere restrictions on oneÃ¢â¬â¢s liberty. Supporters and opponents of capital punishment still debate its effectiveness. Social scientists have collected statistical data on trends in homicide before and after jurisdictions have abolished capital punishment. They have also compared homicide rates in places with and without the death penalty. The great majority of these statistical comparisons indicate that the presence or absence of capital punishment or executions does not visibly influence the rate of homicide. Opponents of capital punishment maintain that these studies refute the argument that the death penalty deters crime. Many capital punishment opponents consider the deterrence argument fully negated and no longer part of the debate. However, supporters of the death penalty dispute that interpretation of the statistical analyses of deterrent effect. Capital punishment advocates note that because the death penalty is reserved for the most aggravated murders, the deterrent effect of capital punishment on such crimes may not be apparent in data on homicide rates in general. Supporters also urge that the conflicting results of various studies indicate that the deterrent effect of the death penalty cannot not be proven or disproven with any certainty. They maintain that in the absence of conclusive proof that the threat of execution might not save some people from being killed, capital punishment should be retained. A unique facet of the modern debate about capital punishment is the characterization of the death penalty as a human rights issue, rather than a debate about the proper punishment of criminals. Modern opposition to the death penalty is seen as a reaction to the political history of the 20th century, most notably the Holocaust- the systematic mass killing of Jews and others during World War II (1939-1945). All the major nations in Western Europe utilized capital punishment prior to World War II. After the defeat of the National Socialist (Nazi) and Fascist governments of Germany and Italy, those two nations became the first major powers in Europe to abolish capital punishment. The postwar movement to end capital punishment, beginning in Italy and Germany and then spreading, represented a reaction to totalitarian forms of government that systematically violated the rights of the individual. The human rights focus on the death penalty has continued, especially in settings of dramatic political change. When people view capital punishment as a human rights issue, countries that are becoming more democratic have been eager to abolish the death penalty, which they associate with the former regime and its abuses of power. For example, a number of former Communist nations abolished capital punishment shortly after the dissolution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1991. Similarly, the multiracial government of South Africa formed in 1994 quickly outlawed a death penalty many associated with apartheid, the official policy of racial segregation that had been in place since the late 1940s. Research Papers on Capital Crimes and ExecutivesAssess the importance of Nationalism 1815-1850 EuropeAppeasement Policy Towards the Outbreak of World War 2Bringing Democracy to AfricaThe Fifth HorsemanThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseDefinition of Export QuotasQuebec and CanadaComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in Capital
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Business Ethics of Fords Pinto - Essay Example This essay discusses the question of constraint upon the freedom to export various types of commodities that have several different interests and issues today. A close examination of those concerns moves far beyond the scope of this paper, yet the use of some of the ethical theories studied lends assistance in informing the discussion. After consideration of the various positions, the conclusion is that the absence of any constraint on exports would be unethical. If, using a form of KantÃ¢â¬â¢s prime objective, the categorical imperative is the protection of the American workforce, many corporations would go out of business because of the associated loss in competitive position. As for exporting those commodities banned in the United States, but not elsewhere, unless the product is known to be harmful or deficient, there is no ethical dilemma. The researcher states that an example of this is clear with NestleÃ¢â¬â¢s exportation of infant formula. While the product itself may be s afe, the misuse by third-world mothers seeking to attenuate the expense results in under-nourished children, children who do not receive the full benefit of a motherÃ¢â¬â¢s natural milk, and recorded deaths. Obviously, this is where the ethical issue becomes the most difficult and where the idea of balance between regulation and corporate responsibility makes the most sense. Should the government force the company to stop exporting a legal product because of a negative impact through product misuse by the consumers? No.
Wednesday, November 20, 2019
How will the Professional MBA program prepare you for your chosen career path - Scholarship Essay Example roduce me to a broad spectrum of opportunities such as pursuing of an entrepreneurial route, progress for my business, handling new and challenging responsibilities and utilizing others such as marketing where my desire lies. This would ensure I achieve a wide array of knowledge base, insights and boost my poise to operate successfully in all environments. Most business executives in the corporate world with MBA degrees are embellished with high levels of responsibility and seniority within their job description. Coupled with my degree in criminal justice, the MBA degree will guarantee flexibility and fluidity in changing of career paths in order to exploit new opportunities hitherto underutilized. It will also to appreciate the complexities involved in business, bolster the practice of law and initiate conversance with the laws governing commerce. This diversity will put me up to date with the goings on in the world of business hence better decision making when it comes to issues of
Monday, November 18, 2019
Selling kidney illegally - Essay Example This is why there is a rising demand for kidneys. That a black market in illegal kidney selling exists cannot be denied but it does so because supply from legal sources is unable to keep up with the rising demand nowadays. There are long waiting lists and many people are left with no choice but to seek kidneys from the abundant illegal sources. The problem is that this has become an affair that is unregulated. As a result, racketing is proliferating, the conditions under which the illegal transplants take place are usually highly risky, the poor in particular are exploited, and numerous other problems prevail. The only solution is regulations, which will be argued for in detail. We shall also cite the story of Moshe, a victim of the black market, and consider the experience of Iran, where the practice is legal, as a model. Unfortunately, this demand for kidneys cannot be met as long as kidney selling remains illegal. Officially conducted transplants are the only legal option but there is a shortage in the available number of willing donors. There are long waiting lines for people that need a new kidney transplant, and according to UNOS, the waiting list for kidney donations is the longest organ-specific waiting list. The number of patients on the U.S. waiting list reached Ã¢â¬Å"97,670 as of Dec. 31, 2007Ã¢â¬ ¦ an increase of nearly 84 percent in 10 yearsÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ (Medical News Today) The wait does not end quickly either, and according to a Harvard Medical School report, the average waiting time between listing and transplantation is projected to be nearly 10 years by 2010 (Gaston, 2003). Also, whilst people are waiting their health is ailing, and deaths are not rare. For example, Ã¢â¬Å"In 2007, nearly 6,000 people died while on the waiting listÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ (ibid) So the wait is not only long , but also in many cases can prove to be fatal. The demand for kidneys is so great that a black market thrives to fulfill it. But it is unregulated and not without
Friday, November 15, 2019
Primary Source and Secondary Sources of Conflict Communication is neither the message transmitted also no message itself. This is mutual understanding, exchange receiver. The communication needs in business must be effective. Communication is the essence of management. The basic functions of management (planning, organization, staffing, guidance and control), can not be good, there is no effective communication. Business communication involves constant flow of information. The feedback of business communication is an integral part in a communication. Organizations these days is very large. It is the number of people involved. Organizations at all levels in the hierarchy. Greater number of levels, the more difficult is the work of the management organization. The communication process command and control organization plays a very important role. You can get instant feedback and misunderstanding in a large organization. There should be between superiors and subÃ ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã¢â¬ ¹Ã ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã¢â¬ ¹-organizations, organizations and soci ety (for example, between management and trade unions) to communicate effectively. This is the key to an organizations success and growth. In any organization, the communication gap is not supposed to happen. Business Communication is goal oriented. The companys rules, regulations and policies are communicated to internal and external organizations. Business communication is to comply with certain rules and norms. In the early stages, the enterprise communications is a limited number of instruments, telephone, but with todays technology, we have a mobile phone, video conferencing, e-mail, satellite communications to support business communication. Effective business communication help in building goodwill of an organizations. The personal qualities is a persons personal characteristics of a person. They are what makes a persons character. They help a person to get along with the new situation. For example, the reliability and quality of patience, employers want a good worker. Other qualities employers value: honesty, self-confidence, flexibility, problem solving skills, kindness, wisdom, leadership, enthusiasm, good sense of humor. Most employers want people who are reliable and easy get along with others. Although the techniques are very important, employers will choose according to their personal qualities, as well as new employees. Personal qualities Effective communication: the employer is looking for is to listen to instructions, these instructions with minimal guidance. They hope that the employees speak, write, and listen effectively, logically organize their own thoughts, and explained everything clearly. Computer and technology literacy: almost all of the work need to know, ranging from beginner to advanced, email, computer software, spreadsheets, word processing, Internet navigation. Creativity: The ability to solve the problem, you can help your transactions, data processing, to develop a vision and reach a resolution. The employer must ensure that, you can conquer the challenges of employment, critical and creative thinking. Teamwork skills: the ability to work well with others at the same time to the pursuit of a common goal. Leadership and management: the leadership of a strong sense of self, self-confidence, and a comprehensive understanding of the companys goals. These qualities, inspire and encourage, provide a solid foundation for the team. Good leadership ability to provide competitive advantage and maximize the companys bottom line performance. Although some organizations do not believe this is true. For you, either as a leader or potential leader, outstanding leadership to your personal as well as the key to the success of your organization. How to successfully become businessman Knowledge of Business Businessman, his business should have a thorough understanding. He should be clear that the aims and objectives of the organization. He should have a thorough understanding of the different functional areas. Business knowledge, knowledge of the law should be supplemented by the trade, finance, marketing, trade. Knowledge of all these aspects is essential to solve complex business problems. Hard work A businessman should work hard. Nothing can replace hard work. Success and hard work. He should be committed to their work. His work will inspire his employees with the same passion. Their own to escape the hard-working people, will not be able to more work from others. Cooperative A businessman to deal with the many complex problems. He had a lot of people to solve their own problems, to seek cooperation. Dependence on others is a necessity in todays business world. Should be with other people should also have the ability to get cooperation. He should be able to adapt to all kinds of people. Brave A processing business to a number of issues. Sometimes, there are conflicting requirements, from a different side. Consumers, employees and the government to be considerate their requirements businessman. He has to coordinate interests. Courage and forward-looking businessman will help him to make an important decision. He should not feel helpless in the face of difficulties. The business is not an easy task these days. Only those people who will be successful will have the ability to face difficulties with a smile on your face. Initiatives and decision-making power A businessman solve many problems. He also made the decision. He should have the ability to the matter to be decided at the appropriate time. His energy to guide the Groups bid to achieve organizational goals. He should take the initiative to solve a variety of problems, they should be seen as a challenge. Responsibility A businessman should assume responsibility for a variety of to activate his subordinates. As a leader, he exercised all the powers and responsibilities. He should bear the responsibility of passing the buck on to others. Subordinates the clues of the action should not be disappointed. These qualities will the confidence of employees, they will face things, more courageous. Suitability A merchant should be according to the circumstances be adjusted. Frequently changing circumstances, there may be one. He will face some challenges courage. He should not lose heart, should be able to adapt to the new environment. A busy operation can not be carried out under static conditions. Changes in the business activities of all types for all to see. Changing business world needs the vitality of the businessman. So good businessman, just according to the necessities of the situation, should be able to. Sociability Another significant the businessman quality is a mixed one, with the ability of any person within two minutes. He must be allowed to introduce yourself to an unidentified person in a very short period of time. Therefore, a businessman, sociable nature, can be easily won many, many popular confidence. 8 questions How to success for being a businessman? What are the personal qualities for being a business man? Does personal qualities important in a businessman? What are the most important things you want me to remember while I run your business? Will I be given a mentor to guide my success? Is there anything youd like to tell me about this position? When did you first realize that you wanted to be a businessman? How big is the threat of new entrants? How much power do your suppliers have? What differentiates your product from the competitors? Introduction of conflict Conflict is an inevitable part of interpersonal relationship. It is how to approach and management, can be constructive or destructive conflict. Conflict think the important thing, when people who hold different views. We live in the community and the family could not see, because we do things. Daily conflict, sometimes small disputes, sometimes violent battle. Each of us according to our own unique personality and cultural background of the conflict. People have different motives, beliefs, values Ã ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã¢â¬ ¹Ã ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã¢â¬ ¹and goals. Two people can perceive and explain the same situation is very different. When rescue workers to respond to major emergencies, we have found work elsewhere. They may be from another village or city in our own country or from another continent. Two people may speak the same language, but a controversial, you may find other response is the same. The other way to deal with conflict may confuse or offend us. Our day-to-day work, the problems and contradictions is natural, the key is to find the right way to overcome these difficulties continue to productive work. A tool to overcome their own views and prejudices, so we can see the other persons point of view. In order to resolve the conflict, we must know their roles, and how we see others. The most common forms of conflict resolution, negotiation, mediation, community meetings, conflict transformation and peer mediation. Which way is best, depending on the nature of the conflict and the parties. Experts in conflict resolution to provide a reasonable proposal Summary how peaceful settlement of disputes, the two sides find acceptable. Each conflict is different, people will react in their own way. But with the desire to solve the problem and a deep understanding of the parties and dispute the root cause, you will usually be able to resolve conflicts before they become violent. Sources of primary conflict There are many reasons or reasons of the conflict in any work environment. Some of the main reasons are: Poor communication: different communication style may lead to misunderstandings between employees or between employees and management personnel. The lack of communication, promote conflict underground. Different values: any workplace by individuals who see a different world. Conflict, there is a lack of acceptance and understanding of these differences. Different interests conflict, their personal goals, and ignore the organizational objectives and organize workers personal fight well-being. Scarce resources: In many cases, the employees feel that they have the competition available resources to do their work. Environment of scarce resources, which will lead to conflict despite awareness of scarce resources. Personality clashes: All the work environment by different personalities. Colleagues to understand and accept each others work and the way to solve the problem, a conflict will occur. Poor performance: When one or more individuals in the work of the unit does not perform potential this is not a solution does not work, conflict is inevitable. The natural pressure of the workplace environment, as well as the conflict between colleagues either personal reasons, this pressure to enable them to establish and develop the work environment will only further weaken next. In many cases, the conflict in the workplace seems to be the fact that in life. We see that different people have different goals and needs, has entered the conflict. We have all seen, may lead to the often intense personal hatred. Understanding of this issue, and to take positive action, they can help solve this problem, a place where they really want, while creating a comfortable working area, so that their organization. In addition, it was agreed that these major sources, the party can solve a lot of problems, and it brings to the surface as well as to obtain benefits, and they may not be the first to think of. Specifically, through the understanding and agreement of the source to resolve conflicts, team members can develop stronger mutual respect, and a new b elief in their work together. A team in a big advantage is its diversity of resources, knowledge and ideas. However, the diversity of the conflict. With the growing number of corporate restructuring work teams need training in conflict resolution will continue to grow. Team conflict is not necessarily destructive. The conflict may lead to new ideas and methods, organizational processes, and to deal with the problem of interest. The conflict, in this sense, can be considered positive, because it is conducive to the surfacing of the important issues, and to provide opportunities for people to develop their communication and interpersonal skills. Workplace by individuals who have their own point of view to see the world. Some employees have a strong belief, they are not willing to compromise. These beliefs can conflict with colleagues, resulting in conflict. For example, if a person is strongly opposed to diversity in the workplace, may be difficult to accept his other workers. In order to avoid conflict with these workers, he must try to accept or initiate more tolerant of those different values. In dealing with conflict, the most important and consistent element is open, honest and clear communication. Few people regard themselves as poor communicators, it is the bounden duty of management, particularly those that require their employees, how they communicate feedback, and how, in the case of conflict can improve. Important that the staff can be assured of recrimination, to say the truth, no two people are exactly the same freedom. Therefore, the personality conflicts in the workplace is inevitable. An employee may have a r eserved personality, while another may be more outgoing and forward-looking. Problems, the two do not understand or do not respect each others inherent nature. For example, employees may feel more outgoing personality is more introverted workers contempt, if not more with him. He might think it is a very small, not only is the personality of the staff. In addition, his practice handling the project may be analytical, and she is intuitive. Conflict when the two do not understand, and respect each other, bigger, more complex distributed organizations, the heavier the parties to communicate effectively, it is difficult to achieve exactly the right person. Addition, the working group loyalty can be a powerful, territory, another group often browse hostile invasion. lot of time and energy is wasted in the address this is not a normal conflicts. competition for limited resources is also a factor in conflict. typical example here is usually normal budget requirements exceed the available f unds which may be the most common source of conflict and the most familiar in all tissues When you create expectations and did not realize, may lead to a lot of negative did not honor the commitment to the customer, voluntary overtime, less than expected wage growth and the allocation of resources to different departments do not have to explain a great deal of These are some simple examples, leading to a conflict between the customer and the company, the employees and management personnel and departments. When the personal or political parties into a process of negotiations to resolve the conflict, their table in a certain direction, in their efforts to resolve the conflict. The most basic in both directions to enter into negotiations, insist on cooperation or competition. Cooperation with the interest-based negotiations process, which leads to the parties to seek a win-win solution. The controversial cooperation between the parties to a negotiated settlement is more likely to develop relations of trust and mutually beneficial solution options. Mutual benefit and win-win approach is considered to be a constructive process. Win/win approach is to change the conflict from adversarial attack and defense, cooperation. It is a powerful change in attitude, change the entire communication process. A person will always be a common solution to the problem, can make the difference. Your readers may be man redirect conflict. First of all, you have to convince yourself. Creative solutions are ef fectively snuffed out. The losing individual or group may reject the leaders. They have the powerful long-lasting negative emotional reactions. The approached to the conflict is collaboration. Its mean mutual solve problem. The participants must have skills for communicating and working in groups effectively. The participants also must have attitudes that support a climate of trust to work through problems. The participants have to use effective problem-solving strategies. This will help them to solve conflict easily In conclusion, I want to repeat that not all conflicts can be resolved. Sometimes, trying to solve this case, will make things worse. The initial information collected and the conclusions to for whatever reason, this relationship is to save, then it may be the best possible recognition, and do whatever you can separate the two sides. I also know more about the primary source of the conflict began. I give some example on primary source. Moreover, I learn about extra knowledge about more about conflict and how to solve a conflict.
Wednesday, November 13, 2019
Wuthering Heights Wuthering Heights is the only book Emily Bronte ever wrote. It is a very powerful story about love and hate and sorrow and death. It spans thirty years and is all narrated by, first Mr. Lockwood, and more importantly, Ellen Dean, the faithful housekeeper. At the beginning of the book, Mr. Lockwood had just arrived at Thrushcross Grange as a tenant. He went to see Mr. Heathcliff, the man he was renting the house from. When he arrives at Wuthering Heights, he meets a young lady the he assumes to be HeathcliffÃ¢â¬â¢s wife. However, Heathcliff tells him that she is not his wife, but his daughter-in-law. When he then meets a young man, he naturally assumes it to be HeathcliffÃ¢â¬â¢s son, but again Heathcliff tells him that he is wrong. Heathcliff makes it very clear that Mr. Lockwood is not welcome. However, Mr. Lockwood vows to visit Wuthering Heights a second time. The next day he does visit Wuthering Heights again and is snowed in over there. He spent the night in a room with three diaries in it - one labeled Catherine Earnshaw, one, Catherine Heathcliff and the last, Catherine Linton. That night he dreams he hears CatherineÃ¢â¬â¢s spirit at the window, and after hearing that, Heathcliff throws open the window and implores her to come in. Mr. Lockwood leaves early the next morning and catches cold. He is bedridden for the next few weeks and asks Ellen Dean to tell him what she knows about the people residing at Wuthering Heights. She agrees. The story really began with Mr. Earnshaw and his son, Hindley and daughter, Catherine. Mr. Earnshaw left town on business and brought back with him an orphan they named Heathcliff. Heathcliff soon turned out to be Mr. EarnshawÃ¢â¬â¢s favorite and he and Catherine became great friends. Hindley despised him for that. When Mr. Earnshaw died, Hindley returned from school married and took over as the master and treated Heathcliff awfully. His quick mind was dulled and he and Catherine became very rebellious. One day, they were over at Thrushcross Grange and saw Edgar and Isabella Linton. They saw Heathcliff and Catherine and thought they are burglars. Edgar sicced his dog on them and Catherine was injured. She stayed at the Grange for a few weeks and returned to Wuthering Heights a sophisticated lady with a furious temper and attitude. HindleyÃ¢â¬â¢s wife, Frances gave birth to a child named Hareton and then died shortly after.